- SCHEDULE
- All club qualifying games must be held within the
months of June, July and August in the year preceding the North
American Open Pairs Flight A (NAP-A), Flight B (NAP-B) and Non-Life
Master Pairs (NAP-C) final.
- Each unit may and should hold one unit final game
between September 1, 2007 and December 11, 2007. Dates
should be
approved by the District NAP coordinator. Units may hold separate
events for each flight. Dates should not conflict with nearby
sectionals or regionals. Dates may not conflict with the North
American Bridge Championships November 16-26 in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Unit NAP coordinators may complete
online sanctions at http://www.acbl.org/units/units.
Sanction requests should be
completed by July 5, 2007, so that the unit final can be
advertised in
the August and subsequent issues of the Contract
Bridge Forum. Sanction requests completed by the fifth of
each month will be advertised in the following month's Contract Bridge Forum.
District 22 will not conduct a unit final.
- District 22 finals - Palm Springs
Regional,
Saturday December 15, 2007. All flights will be two session play
through events held at 10 am and 2:30 pm..
- The NAP-A final will be held the Wednesday and
Thursday March 5 and 6, 2008, preceding the Spring North
American
Bridge Championships (NABC) in Detroit, Michigan.
The NAP-B
and
NAP-C finals will be held Saturday and Sunday, March 15 and 16, 2008
during
the Spring NABC .
- ELIGIBILITY
- Masterpoints won by players in other bridge
organizations, such as the ABA and foreign organizations, must be taken
into account for placement in the flights.
- The NAP-A event is open to any player. The NAP-B
event is open only to players who have fewer than 2000 masterpoints as
of June 2007 masterpoint cycle*. The Non-Life Master Pairs is open only
to players who have have not attained the rank of Life Master and have
fewer than 500 masterpoints as of June 2007 masterpoint cycle*.
*June masterpoint cycle is available before 15th of May.
- A player who is eligible for Flight B may play in both
Flight A and Flight B, prior to the national final, until concurrence
forces him to choose one or the other. A player who is eligible for the
Non-Life Master Flight may play in the NANLMP as well as Flights A
and/or B prior to the national final, until concurrence forces him to
choose one or another. All District 22 finals will be held
at the same time.
- To be eligible for the unit stage, a player must
qualify at any club in any unit or district.
- At the club stage, a player may play at any
participating club as often as desired and each time with any player.
- At the club stage, a player may qualify and earn
masterpoints with any member of the ACBL or with a non-member of the
ACBL. At the unit level and beyond, a player must be an ACBL member in
good standing.
- At the unit stage, players must:
- both be members of District 22 (see appendix I in
these conditions for membership residency requirements); and
- both have qualified in a club
- A player may enter only one unit stage competition per
flight in the NAP event. A stratified event covers all club flight
eligibility options.
- A person or pair may represent a district in only one
flight at the national level.
- A player whose membership dues accompany the unit
stage game report is deemed to have been a member at time of entry. In
order to receive reimbursement to the National North American Final, a
player's membership and/or Life Master service fees must be current at
the unit stage, district final and the commencement of the national
final.
- A player who moves to a different district during the
course of the event may elect to continue in his original district, and
not his new district, for the remainder of the event.
- To be eligible for the District 22 stage, a player
must have qualified at a unit stage game.
- QUALIFYING
- At the club stage, players in eligible partnerships
finishing in the top half (rounded up and including ties) of their
field or playing "average," each qualify to enter a unit stage in their
home district. When an ineligible pair finishes in a qualifying
position, qualification, but not masterpoints, extends another
position. A pair eligible for NAP-B who qualify for a unit stage of
NAP-A also receive qualification to a NAP-B unit stage in their home
district. A pair eligible for the NANLMP who qualify for a unit stage
of NAP-A also receive qualification to both a NAP-B and a NANLMP unit
stage in their home district. A pair eligible for NANLMP who qualify
for a unit stage of NAP-B also receive qualification to a NANLMP unit
stage in their home district. See appendix III for chart of
qualifiers.
- Players who qualify are encouraged, but not required,
to enter the unit stage.
- At the unit stage, partnerships finishing in the top
50% (rounded up and including ties) of their entire field qualify for
the district final. A pair playing whose score is average or better
qualify for the district final.
- An ACBL member who qualified at the club stage and
represents his NCBO or ACBL in WBF competition held in conflict with
his unit stage is granted qualification to the district final with a
player of his choice who has qualified at the club level and has not
played beyond that level. This also includes ACBL members who are WBF
officials, npcs and coaches on official ACBL/NCBO business and unable
to be present at unit qualifying.
- Qualified players are encouraged, but not required, to
play in the district final. If a qualified pair chooses not to play in
the District final, qualification will not extend to the next pair.
- New partnerships may be formed at the district finals
from unit qualified eligible players. NOTE: It is not necessary for
players playing together in a district final to have qualified from the
same unit.
- At the district stage, the top two NAP-A pairs overall
will qualify to play in the North American final. One district will
earn the right to qualify a third pair based on club stage
participation (see footnotes). At the district stage, the top two NAP-B
and the top two NANLMP pairs overall will qualify to play in the North
American final. Two districts in the NAP-B and the NANLMP event will
earn the right to qualify a third pair based on club stage
participation (see footnote). Any margin will serve to break a tie for
qualifying to the North American final. An exact tie will be broken per
ACBL tie-breaking procedures.
- Each district will qualify a third pair for the
National finals in all flights. The 3rd place pair will not be
subsidized by the ACBL except in districts which have been awarded an
additional qualifier and then the 4th place pair qualifies as the
unsubsidized pair.
- When the district final is held at a single site the
pair with the third highest score will be unsubsidized. When the final
is held at split sites, the qualifiers may be apportioned on any
objective basis, provided the basis is published in the district's
Conditions of Contest. The district 22 final is held at a
single site.
- The NAP-A pairs placing first and second (including
ties) in a single-site district final, and the pairs placing first
(including ties) in a split-site district final if scored and ranked
separately, earn Blue Ribbon Pairs qualification. The NAP-B and the
NANLMP pairs placing first and second (including ties) in a single-site
district final, and the pairs placing first (including ties) in a
split-site district final if scored and ranked separately, earn
appropriate ribbon qualification.
- Should a qualified pair be unable to participate in
the North American final, an alternate pair (based on order of finish
in the district final from the same qualifying field) will replace
them
- Finalists will be notified of ACBL policy regarding
reimbursement and travel arrangements.
- Life Master service fees must be current at the unit
and district finals in order to be eligible to receive qualified
reimbursements to an NABC. A player whose Life Master service fees
accompany the unit final or district final stage game report satisfies
this requirement. In order to receive reimbursements to the North
American final, if membership or Life Master service fee has lapsed in
the interim, it must be current by the start of the National American
finals.
- The North American final will be a four-session event,
with between 52 and 78 pairs competing in a two-session playthrough to
qualify for a 28 pair two-session playthrough final (with carry-over as
per ACBL formula).
- The winning NAP-A pair will automatically be one of
next year's two at-large pairs qualifying for the North American Flight
A final (see footnotes).
- The NAP-A pairs placing in the top ten (including
ties) at the North American Open Pairs national final earn Blue Ribbon
Pairs qualification, and U.S. pairs in this category earn qualifying
points for international competition on the same scale as in the Blue
Ribbon Pairs and the Life Master Pairs. The NAP-B and NANLMP pairs
placing in the top ten (including ties) at the North American national
final earn appropriate Ribbon qualification.
- CONVENTIONS
- At the club stage, each club determines the
conventions to be allowed in its games, subject to established ACBL
minimum guidelines.
- At the NAP-A unit stage, the ACBL General Convention
Chart applies. The ACBL General Convention Chart applies at NAP-B
and NAP-CNLMP district stage. The ACBL Midchart applied to NAP-A
district stage.
- The ACBL MidChart applies at the North American Open
Pairs-Flight A final. The ACBL General Convention Chart applies at the
North American final for Flight B and the Non-Life Master Pairs flight.
- SUBSTITUTES
- At any stage of the competition, the district director
(or his designee), the district NAP coordinator, the tournament
director or the tournament committee may approve a substitute in an
emergency. A substitute must meet the eligibility requirements listed
in II.A. above, may not appreciably strengthen the partnership and is
subject to the following limitations:
- At the club stage, if a substitute plays more than
fifty percent of the boards, he becomes the contestant of record.
- At any stage beyond the club stage, a substitute
is not permitted for more than fifty percent of the boards played in a
qualifying session or sessions; for more than fifty percent of the
boards played in a final session or sessions; or for more than one
session in any case. Additionally, the substitute must be a member of
the district and must be either eliminated from the event or not yet
qualified from the unit stage.
- A replacement is not permitted at any stage of the
competition.
- AWARDS
- At the NAP-A club stage, masterpoint awards are half
red and half black, sectional rating. A club game conducted by
invitation only awards black points only, at 80% of sectional rating.
At the NAP-B club stage, masterpoint awards are half red and half
black, at 86% of sectional rating. A NAP-B club game conducted by
invitation only awards black points only, at 60% of sectional rating.
At the NANLMP club stage, masterpoint awards are half red and half
black, at 60% of sectional rating. A NANLMP club game conducted by
invitation only awards black points only, at 45% of sectional rating.
- At the NAP-A unit stage, for one session events,
masterpoint awards are red at sectional rating. At the NAP-B unit
stage, masterpoint awards are red at 86% of sectional rating. At the
NANLMP unit stage, masterpoint awards are red at 60% of sectional
rating. Overall masterpoints awarded at two or more session unit finals
are 20% gold, 80% red for Flight A; 10% gold, 90% red at 86% sectional
rating for Flight B; and 5% gold, 95% red at 60% sectional rating for
the Non-Life Master event. Session awards are red at sectional
rating.
- At the NAP-A and NAP-B district stage, overall awards
and section first are gold, others are red. At the NANLMP district
stage, overall awards are 25% gold and 75% red. Session awards are all
red. The award for the NAP-A first place overall is arbitrary and based
on the number of sessions in the district final as follows:
2 sessions - 24.00
masterpoints
3 sessions - 30.00 masterpoints
4 sessions - 36.00 masterpoints
Session awards are regional rating. (In districts
holding a separately scored and ranked split-site final, the applicable
arbitrary first place award will be divided in proportion to each
site's share of the total tables.)
The award for the NAP-B first place overall is
arbitrary and based on the number of sessions in the district final as
follows:
2 sessions - 16.00 masterpoints
3 sessions - 20.00 masterpoints
4 sessions - 24.00 masterpoints
Session awards are 86% regional rating. (In districts
holding a separately scored and ranked split-site final, the applicable
arbitrary first place award will be divided in proportion to each
site's share of the total tables.)
The award for the NANLMP first place overall is
arbitrary and based on the number of sessions in the district final as
follows:
2 sessions - 10.00 masterpoints
3 sessions - 12.50 masterpoints
4 sessions - 15.00 masterpoints
Session awards are 60% of regional rating. (In
districts holding a separately scored and ranked split-site final, the
applicable arbitrary first place award will be divided in proportion to
each site's share of the total tables.)
- At the North American final, the winners of the NAP-A
will receive 65 gold points. Session awards are gold/red, national
rating. The NAP-B winners will receive 45 gold points. Session awards
are gold/red, at 86% of national rating. The NANLMP winners will
receive 30 masterpoints. Overall and section top awards will be 1/3
gold and 2/3 red. Remaining session awards are red and all session
awards are at 60% of national rating.
- DISTRICT DIRECTOR AUTHORITY
All ACBL tournament regulations, though
not specifically included in these conditions, apply to this event
throughout. Only in the case of an unforeseen situation, the district
director (or his designee), in consultation with the ACBL NAP
coordinator, may make exceptions to these conditions. In emergency
situations only, the district director on his own may make decisions
consistent with the spirit of these conditions of contest. In cases of
dual residence, active military duty, school attendance or similar
cases of extended temporary or permanent relocation, the ACBL NAP
coordinator has final authority of the residency and/or the
qualification requirements (see Appendix I to these conditions). The
district director has final authority on any item not specified in the
conditions of contest.
APPENDIX I:
Board Item 003-106
Members of the ACBL are normally expected to
belong to the unit in which they reside. If a member chooses to belong
to a unit in which he/she does not reside, the member must specifically
make this request in writing to the ACBL stating the unit of preference
and the reasons for the request. Further, if the unit is not in the
same district as where he/she resides, both districts must approve the
membership in the other district. The following are some of the reasons
why a member would be given permission to belong to a unit outside the
district of residence (To warrant consideration, a player should meet
at least two of the six reasons listed.):
- Plays at least once a month in a club in that unit
- Attends STACs or Sectionals in that unit at least twice a
year
- Attends the annual unit dinner and/or membership meeting
- Participates in unit special events
- Serves on the unit board and/or unit committees
- Serves on the district board and/or district committees
If it is determined that a member requests a
change of unit membership for the sole purpose of Grand National Teams
(GNT) or North American Pairs (NAP) play, the request must be denied.
The membership approval granted by a district
in which the member does not reside will be reviewed by that district
every five years to assure the above criteria continue to justify
non-residency membership.
If a player has been a member of that unit and
wishes to remain and does not participate in GNT and NAP events in that
district, permission may be granted by the district without the player
meeting any of the six criteria.
APPENDIX II:
NAP-A
[1] districts will be ranked from 1 to 25 (lowest to
highest) on two scales:
(a) the total tables in play at the club level in
Flight A based on reports received in Memphis by October 1, and,
(b) the ratio of total tables in play at the club
level in Flight A to the total membership of the district as of the May
1 cycle.
The rankings in (a) and (b) will be added and the
district with the highest sum will earn an at-large berth. A tie will
be broken first in favor of the highest participation percentage, and
then by total club level entries. A district may not earn two at-large
berths (see [2] following).
[2] The pair winning the National final the previous
year earns the second at-large berth. This pair may play in the current
event at any stage for which they are eligible and qualified. Should
either player not be able to participate in the National final, a
second district earns an at-large berth as outlined in [1] preceding.
Should either or both players move to a different district, the pair is
deemed to represent the original district.
|
NAP-B
[1] Districts will be ranked from 1 to 25 (lowest to
highest) on two scales:
(1) the total tables in play at the club level in
Flight B based on reports received in Memphis by October 1, and,
(2) the ratio of total tables in play at the club
level in Flight B to the total membership of the district as of the May
1 cycle.
The rankings in (1) and (2) will be added and the two
districts with the highest sums will earn at-large berths. Ties will be
broken first in favor of the highest participation percentage, and then
by total club level entries.
|
NANLMP
[1] Districts will be ranked from 1 to 25 (lowest to
highest) on two scales:
(1) the total tables in play at the club level in the
Non-Life Master flight based on reports received in Memphis by October
1, and,
(2) the ratio of total tables in play at the club
level in the Non-Life Master flight to the total Non-Life Master flight
membership of the district as of the May 1 cycle.
The rankings in (2) shall be doubled, then added to the
rankings from (1). The two districts with the highest sums will earn
at-large berths. A tie will be broken first in favor of the highest
participation percentage, and then by total club level entries.
|
|